Ute Werner

1.6k citations
33 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ute Werner

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Ute Werner
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 346
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 672
  • Pharmaceutical Science 126
  • Spectroscopy 212
  • Materials Chemistry 341
Replace Hajime Hoshi with:
Hajime Hoshi Japan
K. Itoh Japan
Kwang‐Im Oh South Korea
М. В. Алфимов Russia
Lisa Emily Chirlian United States
P. Bothorel France
Torsten Fiebig United States
Leigh B. Clark United States
Wolfgang Förner Saudi Arabia
Patrick M. Hare United States
Ute Werner relative to Hajime Hoshi Japan Hajime Hoshi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Hajime Hoshi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Werner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Werner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Werner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Werner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Werner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Werner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Werner. The network helps show where Ute Werner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ute Werner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Werner Line = papers co-authored together Ute Werner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014281
2 2008132
3 2010125
4 2008103
5 200986
6 201073
7 199866
8 199555
9 199652
10 201048
11 201046
12 198736
13 199634
14 199031
15 201127
16 198725
17 198525
18 199015
19 200613
20 199013

About Ute Werner

Ute Werner is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (10 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (346 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (672 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (126 citations), Spectroscopy (212 citations) and Materials Chemistry (341 citations). Ute Werner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Croatia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vlasta Bonačić‐Koutecký, Roland Mitrić, Thomas Kissel, Toshinori Suzuki, Dmitrii Nabok, Claudia Draxl, Santiago Rigamonti, Stephan Sagmeister, P. Pavone and Stefan Kontur. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmaceutical Research, The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Archiv der Pharmazie and Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact