UNESCO

591 citations
23 papers · 120 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
    • Colonialism, slavery, and trade
    • African history and culture studies

Papers in

    • African Studies and Geopolitics 2
    • Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
    • African history and culture studies 2
    • Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 2
    • Human Rights and Development 1

UNESCO

23 papers receiving 84 citations

Peers

UNESCO
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Archeology 3
  • Anthropology 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 53
  • Development 4
  • Linguistics and Language 5
Replace Alain Gheerbrant with:
Alain Gheerbrant
Barbara Bradby Ireland
Fawn M. Brodie United States
Ter Ellingson Canada
Tom Winnifrith United Kingdom
Homer H. Dubs United Kingdom
Jean Chevalier
Arthur L. Campa United States
Walther Heissig
Michael Aris United Kingdom
UNESCO relative to Alain Gheerbrant Alain Gheerbrant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Alain Gheerbrant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by UNESCO

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of UNESCO's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by UNESCO with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UNESCO more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by UNESCO

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by UNESCO. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by UNESCO. The network helps show where UNESCO may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside UNESCO, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with UNESCO Line = papers co-authored together UNESCO links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198519
2 197818
3 198813
4 198211
5 19617
6 19617
7 20226
8 19716
9 19665
10 19815
11 19614
12 19583
13 19653
14 19692
15 19682
16 19632
17 19761
18 19891
19 19831
20 19801

About UNESCO

UNESCO is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 23 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African Studies and Geopolitics (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), Human Rights and Development (1 paper), Indian History and Philosophy (1 paper), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (1 paper) and International Law and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (3 citations), Anthropology (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (53 citations), Development (4 citations) and Linguistics and Language (5 citations). UNESCO has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Félix, David Northrup, Martin J. Murray, Jonathan R. Cole, Christopher Moseley, Alexandre Nicolas, D. Mackenzie Brown, Julius Gould, Creighton Gabel and Daryll Forde. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Technology and Culture, Youth & Society, Journal of Ecology and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact