Uma M

60 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Uma M
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Signal Processing 95
  • Human-Computer Interaction 42
  • Computer Networks and Communications 149
  • Information Systems 107
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 73
Replace Muhammad Asif with:
Muhammad Asif Pakistan
Dohyun Kim South Korea
A. Ambikapathy India
Xiaoyu Chen China
Essam Debie Australia
Kathryn Kasmarik Australia
Jiaxing Shen China
Shahid Mahmood Awan Pakistan
Rajan Shankaran Australia
Kuan-Cheng Lin Taiwan
Uma M relative to Muhammad Asif Pakistan Muhammad Asif's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Muhammad Asif · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Uma M

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Uma M's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uma M with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uma M more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Uma M

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uma M. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uma M. The network helps show where Uma M may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Uma M, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Uma M Line = papers co-authored together Uma M links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013140
2 202145
3 202042
4 201442
5 202232
6 201320
7 201319
8 202319
9 201316
10 202312
11 201212
12
A COMPARATIVE STUDY AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF REACTIVE QUALITY OF SERVICE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE ADHOC NETWORKS
200910
13 201710
14 20229
15 20118
16 20137
17
Growth, litterfall and litter decomposition of Casuarina equisetifolia in a semiarid zone.
20146
18
Survey on Awareness and Security Issues in Password Management Strategies
20105
19 20245
20 20205

About Uma M

Uma M is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 74 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (5 papers), Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (5 papers), Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques (5 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (4 papers) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (95 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (42 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (149 citations), Information Systems (107 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (73 citations). Uma M has collaborated with scholars based in India, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include G. Padmavathi, S. Prabhu, B. K. Vinayagam, D. G. Narayan, T. Sheela, K. Rajendran, P. Chezhian, V. Praveena, Vivek Vivek and G. Saranya. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Scientific Reports, Energies and Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact