Ulrich Hoefer

503 citations
14 papers · 403 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ulrich Hoefer

14 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Ulrich Hoefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Bioengineering 163
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 54
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 311
  • Biomedical Engineering 170
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 62
Replace Matthew Post with:
Matthew Post United States
Shankar Baliga United States
Kapil Sood India
Philippe Ménini France
Lourdes Alwis United Kingdom
B. Tsizh Ukraine
Yongzhong Bai China
Da Meng China
Kavita Sharma India
SeungHwan Yi South Korea
Ulrich Hoefer relative to Matthew Post United States Matthew Post's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Matthew Post · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrich Hoefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrich Hoefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrich Hoefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrich Hoefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrich Hoefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrich Hoefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrich Hoefer. The network helps show where Ulrich Hoefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ulrich Hoefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ulrich Hoefer Line = papers co-authored together Ulrich Hoefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2001147
2 201166
3 199440
4 199536
5 199725
6 199520
7 201120
8 201118
9 201213
10 199811
11 19983
12 19942
13 20051
14 20061

About Ulrich Hoefer

Ulrich Hoefer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Bioengineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 14 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (10 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Fire Detection and Safety Systems (2 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (163 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (54 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (311 citations), Biomedical Engineering (170 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (62 citations). Ulrich Hoefer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Maximilian Fleischer, Klaus Steiner, Jürgen Wöllenstein, Elmar Wagner, Gerd Sulz, Gerd Kühner, H. Böttner, C. Köhl, D. Briand and Ν. F. de Rooij. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, tm - Technisches Messen, ChemInform, Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE and Procedia Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact