Ulf Hohmann
Impact in
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Ecology top 2%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Nikica Šprem (1 shared paper)Jānis Ozoliņš (1 shared paper)Alain Licoppe (1 shared paper)Nikolay Markov (1 shared paper)Éric Baubet (1 shared paper)Andrea Monaco (1 shared paper)Boštjan Pokorny (1 shared paper)Tomasz Podgórski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Journal of Wildlife Research (7 papers)Wildlife Biology (2 papers)Journal of Wildlife Management (1 paper)Pest Management Science (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyLuxembourgUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ulf Hohmann
21 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Ulf Hohmann's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Small Animals 223
- Ecology 679
- Ecological Modeling 110
- Agronomy and Crop Science 177
- Parasitology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Ulf Hohmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulf Hohmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulf Hohmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulf Hohmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ulf Hohmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulf Hohmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulf Hohmann. The network helps show where Ulf Hohmann may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ulf Hohmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 573 |
| 2 | 2004 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Ulf Hohmann
Ulf Hohmann is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (18 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (223 citations), Ecology (679 citations), Ecological Modeling (110 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (177 citations) and Parasitology (89 citations). Ulf Hohmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Luxembourg and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nikica Šprem, Jānis Ozoliņš, Alain Licoppe, Nikolay Markov, Éric Baubet, Andrea Monaco, Boštjan Pokorny, Tomasz Podgórski, Carlos Fonseca and Giovanna Massei. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Wildlife Research, Wildlife Biology, Journal of Wildlife Management, Pest Management Science and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.