Ulf Hohmann
Impact in
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Ecology top 5%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Sandra Cellina (1 shared paper)Tomasz Podgórski (1 shared paper)Carlos Manoel Da Fonseca (1 shared paper)Boštjan Pokorny (1 shared paper)A. J. de Nahlik (1 shared paper)Jiřı́ Kamler (1 shared paper)Nikolay Markov (2 shared papers)Giovanna Massei (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Journal of Wildlife Research (7 papers)Wildlife Biology (2 papers)Journal of Wildlife Management (1 paper)Pest Management Science (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyLuxembourgSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Ulf Hohmann
23 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Ulf Hohmann's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Small Animals 237
- Ecology 728
- Ecological Modeling 120
- Agronomy and Crop Science 193
- Parasitology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Ulf Hohmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulf Hohmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulf Hohmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulf Hohmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ulf Hohmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulf Hohmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulf Hohmann. The network helps show where Ulf Hohmann may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ulf Hohmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 631 |
| 2 | 2004 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 3 |
About Ulf Hohmann
Ulf Hohmann is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (20 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers) and Ecology and biodiversity studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (237 citations), Ecology (728 citations), Ecological Modeling (120 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (193 citations) and Parasitology (95 citations). Ulf Hohmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Luxembourg and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Cellina, Tomasz Podgórski, Carlos Manoel Da Fonseca, Boštjan Pokorny, A. J. de Nahlik, Jiřı́ Kamler, Nikolay Markov, Giovanna Massei, Jānis Ozoliņš and Alain M. Licoppe. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Wildlife Research, Wildlife Biology, Journal of Wildlife Management, Pest Management Science and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.