Trevor Fenner

45 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Trevor Fenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 77
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 121
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 91
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 42
  • Geometry and Topology 46
Replace J. Michael Steele with:
J. Michael Steele United States
S. G. Mohanty Canada
Steven P. Lalley United States
R. T. Smythe United States
Florin Avram France
Anant P. Godbole United States
David Aldous United States
Neil J. Calkin United States
D. J. Hartfiel United States
Christian Komusiewicz Germany
Trevor Fenner relative to J. Michael Steele United States J. Michael Steele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
J. Michael Steele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Trevor Fenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trevor Fenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trevor Fenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trevor Fenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trevor Fenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trevor Fenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trevor Fenner. The network helps show where Trevor Fenner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Trevor Fenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Trevor Fenner Line = papers co-authored together Trevor Fenner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198761
2 201857
3 199550
4 200239
5 198329
6 200521
7 200619
8 198517
9 201311
10
An Algorithm for Finding Hamilton Cycles in a Random Graph
198510
11 200710
12 198110
13 20007
14 19747
15 20097
16 20106
17 20035
18 20015
19 20005
20 19815

About Trevor Fenner

Trevor Fenner is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Network Analysis Techniques (18 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (12 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (11 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (6 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (6 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (5 papers), Graph theory and applications (5 papers) and Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (77 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (121 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (91 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (42 citations) and Geometry and Topology (46 citations). Trevor Fenner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Alan Frieze, Mark Levene, George Loizou, B Bollobás, Judit Bar‐Ilan, Martin Dyer, Andrew Thomason, Paul H. Brown, Béla Bollobás and George Roussos. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Graph Theory, Discrete Mathematics, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, BIT Numerical Mathematics and Computer Networks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact