Tracey Lintern

426 citations
10 papers · 311 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Tracey Lintern

10 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Tracey Lintern
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 88
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 58
  • General Health Professions 55
  • Conservation 7
Replace Kai Baumann with:
Kai Baumann Germany
S Dion Canada
Michael Shipley United Kingdom
M Wolf Netherlands
Ann M. Voda United States
Claudia Toppo Italy
Lindsey M. Knowles United States
Jean‐Pierre Schuster France
Anna F. van Leeuwen Netherlands
Brian D. Doan Canada
Tracey Lintern relative to Kai Baumann Germany Kai Baumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kai Baumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tracey Lintern

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tracey Lintern's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tracey Lintern with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tracey Lintern more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tracey Lintern

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tracey Lintern. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tracey Lintern. The network helps show where Tracey Lintern may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Tracey Lintern, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tracey Lintern Line = papers co-authored together Tracey Lintern links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201092
2
Before and after training: A case study of intervention
200088
3 200146
4 200028
5 199923
6 200217
7 19996
8
The reliability and validity of dementia care mapping.
20034
9
Improving Quality in Dementia Care: Relationships between care staff attitudes, behaviour and resident quality of life
20094
10 19993

About Tracey Lintern

Tracey Lintern is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (1 paper) and Family Support in Illness (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (88 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (58 citations), General Health Professions (55 citations) and Conservation (7 citations). Tracey Lintern has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Kenealy, J. Graham Beaumont, Stephanie Benson, Bob Woods and Anthea Innes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Quality of Life Research, Dementia, British Journal of Clinical Psychology and Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact