Tor P. Schultz

111 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Tor P. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Building and Construction 590
  • Biotechnology 264
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 84
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.0k
  • Plant Science 804
Replace Éric Gelhaye with:
Éric Gelhaye France
Huizhong Wang China
Richard W. Hemingway United States
Tomohisa Hasunuma Japan
Xiao‐Jun Ji China
Peter E. Laks United States
Edward E. K. Baidoo United States
Kris Morreel Belgium
Zhiwen Wang China
Takayoshi Higuchi Japan
Tor P. Schultz relative to Éric Gelhaye France Éric Gelhaye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Éric Gelhaye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tor P. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tor P. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tor P. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tor P. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tor P. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tor P. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tor P. Schultz. The network helps show where Tor P. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tor P. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tor P. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Tor P. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000181
2 2007140
3 2002121
4 1985114
5 1986107
6 199297
7 201495
8 199488
9 199072
10 198370
11 198567
12 198464
13 199563
14 199560
15 198557
16 199056
17
Rapid secondary analysis of lignocellulose: comparison of near infrared (NIR) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR).
199054
18 199448
19 198446
20 200745

About Tor P. Schultz

Tor P. Schultz is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Building and Construction and Ecology, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lignin and Wood Chemistry (31 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (20 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (18 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (14 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (12 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (11 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (9 papers) and Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (590 citations), Biotechnology (264 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (84 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.0k citations) and Plant Science (804 citations). Tor P. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Darrel D. Nicholas, Gary D. McGinnis, Thomas H. Fisher, Harry P. Schultz, Alan F. Preston, Emily B. Schultz, Willard E. Collier, Christopher J. Biermann, William P. Henry and V. F. Kalasinsky. Their work appears in journals such as Holzforschung, Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology, Phytochemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact