Tomas Toft

4.8k citations
29 papers · 1.8k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Tomas Toft

27 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Tomas Toft
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 705
  • Philosophy 150
  • Artificial Intelligence 351
  • Clinical Psychology 187
  • Family Practice 14
Replace Matthew Broadbent with:
Matthew Broadbent United Kingdom
Lei Chen China
Tasha Glenn United States
Curtis Tatsuoka United States
David Newby Australia
Renée R. Taylor United States
Serguei Pakhomov United States
Joyce Y.C. Chan Hong Kong
Richard Jackson United Kingdom
Anna Hart United Kingdom
Tomas Toft relative to Matthew Broadbent United Kingdom Matthew Broadbent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Matthew Broadbent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Toft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Toft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Toft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Toft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Toft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Toft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Toft. The network helps show where Tomas Toft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomas Toft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomas Toft Line = papers co-authored together Tomas Toft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007227
2 2005195
3 2004157
4 2005154
5 2012148
6 2005126
7 2012116
8 200296
9 200795
10 200584
11 200760
12 200550
13 201041
14 201938
15 201832
16 200931
17
The FIP study: a randomised, controlled trial of screening and recognition of psychiatric disorders.
200330
18 200528
19 201326
20 201318

About Tomas Toft

Tomas Toft is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (8 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (4 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (2 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (1 paper) and Hydrogen's biological and therapeutic effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (705 citations), Philosophy (150 citations), Artificial Intelligence (351 citations), Clinical Psychology (187 citations) and Family Practice (14 citations). Tomas Toft has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Per Fink, Frede Olesen, Lisbeth Frostholm, Eva Ørnbøl, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Eva Oernboel, Marianne Rosendal, Thijs Veugen, Reginald L. Lagendijk and Zekeriya Erkin. Their work appears in journals such as Psychosomatic Medicine, Family Practice, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Journal of Cryptology and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact