Tom Scherzer

83 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Tom Scherzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Orthodontics 133
  • Analytical Chemistry 305
  • Organic Chemistry 777
  • Biophysics 127
  • Polymers and Plastics 215
Replace Milton Faria Diniz with:
Milton Faria Diniz Brazil
Afshin Ghanbari‐Siahkali Denmark
Sherif Elbasuney Egypt
Ferdinand Rodriguez United States
Laurence Lecamp France
J. H. Hodgkin Australia
Yuting Huang China
Kenneth C. Cole Canada
Mogens Hinge Denmark
Keiko Gotoh Japan
Tom Scherzer relative to Milton Faria Diniz Brazil Milton Faria Diniz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Milton Faria Diniz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Scherzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Scherzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Scherzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Scherzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Scherzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Scherzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Scherzer. The network helps show where Tom Scherzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Scherzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Scherzer Line = papers co-authored together Tom Scherzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013160
2 1999122
3 200085
4 200459
5 202158
6 200550
7 201544
8 199442
9 199941
10 201936
11 200235
12 200233
13 201132
14 200432
15 200932
16 201731
17 202329
18 200929
19 200227
20 201624

About Tom Scherzer

Tom Scherzer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics, Archeology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photopolymerization techniques and applications (37 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (24 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (15 papers), Epoxy Resin Curing Processes (14 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (13 papers), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (13 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (10 papers) and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (133 citations), Analytical Chemistry (305 citations), Organic Chemistry (777 citations), Biophysics (127 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (215 citations). Tom Scherzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Decker, Gabriele Mirschel, R. Mehnert, Michael R. Buchmeiser, Sergej Naumov, Wolfgang Knolle, Veronika Strehmel, Christian Schmidt, H. Langguth and Armin Tauber. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Organic Coatings, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Applied Spectroscopy, Journal of Applied Polymer Science and Macromolecular Symposia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact