Tom Riles

755 citations
7 papers · 480 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Riles

7 papers receiving 454 citations

Tom Riles's Hit Papers

Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis 2016 · 390 citations
3900+3+6Years since publication100200300

Peers

Tom Riles
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 398
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 178
  • Neurology 69
  • Epidemiology 90
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 11
Replace Riles Ts with:
Riles Ts United States
Klaus Kerschner Austria
Imparato Am United States
Kathy Dougherty United States
Carlo Setacci Italy
D.G. Tealdi Italy
Nadim Al‐Mubarek United States
Margriet Fokkema Israel
Jeffrey Jim United States
Subbarao Myla United States
Tom Riles relative to Riles Ts United States Riles Ts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×50×
Riles Ts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Riles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Riles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Riles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Riles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Riles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Riles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Riles. The network helps show where Tom Riles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Riles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Riles Line = papers co-authored together Tom Riles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Hit paper breakdown →
2016390
2
The hemodynamics of beta-blockade in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
198752
3 200617
4 20178
5
Limited success of lumbar sympathectomy in the prevention of ischemic limb loss in diabetic patients.
19818
6 19953
7 19952

About Tom Riles

Tom Riles is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (5 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (1 paper), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (398 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (178 citations), Neurology (69 citations), Epidemiology (90 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (11 citations). Tom Riles has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William A. Gray, Gary M. Ansel, Michael R. Jaff, Kenneth Rosenfield, D. Chris Metzger, Jon S. Matsumura, Lawrence R. Wechsler, Seemant Chaturvedi, F.Gregory Baumann and Patrick J. Lamparello. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Radiology, New England Journal of Medicine, PubMed and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact