Tom Leigh
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 2
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 2
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 1
- Co-authors
- Howard Steele (2 shared papers)Peter Fonagy (2 shared papers)Mary Target (2 shared papers)Andrew J. Gerber (2 shared papers)Roger G. Kennedy (2 shared papers)Miriam Steele (2 shared papers)H. Löo (1 shared paper)R. G. Priest (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (2 papers)Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (1 paper)BMJ (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaFrance
In The Last Decade
Tom Leigh
4 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Tom Leigh's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
- Social Psychology 673
- Applied Psychology 37
- Demography 94
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Leigh
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Leigh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Leigh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Leigh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Leigh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Leigh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Leigh. The network helps show where Tom Leigh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Tom Leigh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 698 |
| 2 | The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 600 |
| 3 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 2 |
About Tom Leigh
Tom Leigh is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 4 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (1 paper), Menstrual Health and Disorders (1 paper) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Social Psychology (673 citations), Applied Psychology (37 citations), Demography (94 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations). Tom Leigh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and France. Frequent co-authors include Howard Steele, Peter Fonagy, Mary Target, Andrew J. Gerber, Roger G. Kennedy, Miriam Steele, H. Löo and R. G. Priest. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.