Tom Lavers

36 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers

Tom Lavers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 328
  • Development 123
  • Soil Science 224
  • Safety Research 118
  • Political Science and International Relations 156
Replace An Ansoms with:
An Ansoms Belgium
Surjit S. Bhalla United States
Blessings Chinsinga Malawi
Lionel Cliffe United Kingdom
Karuti Kanyinga Kenya
Deryke Belshaw United Kingdom
Tobias Hagmann Switzerland
Magdalena León Colombia
Lotsmart Fonjong Cameroon
Fantu Cheru United States
Tom Lavers relative to An Ansoms Belgium An Ansoms's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
An Ansoms · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Lavers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Lavers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Lavers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Lavers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Lavers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Lavers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Lavers. The network helps show where Tom Lavers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Tom Lavers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Lavers Line = papers co-authored together Tom Lavers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012157
2 2012106
3 201677
4 201942
5 201833
6 201633
7 201529
8 201627
9 201924
10 201324
11 201523
12 201820
13 202118
14 200714
15 201613
16
The role of foreign investment in Ethiopia’s smallholder-focused agricultural development strategy
201112
17 201910
18 20217
19 20167
20
Asking people what they want or telling them what they “need”? Contrasting “A Theory of Human Need” with local expressions of goals
20077

About Tom Lavers

Tom Lavers is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science and Development, having authored 37 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (12 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (11 papers), International Development and Aid (10 papers), African history and culture analysis (8 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (6 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (328 citations), Development (123 citations), Soil Science (224 citations), Safety Research (118 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (156 citations). Tom Lavers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sam Hickey, Festus Boamah, Miguel Niño‐Zarazúa, Barnaby Dye, Uma Rani, Marianne Furrer, Alula Pankhurst, Philippa Bevan and Addis Ababa. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Peasant Studies, Social Science & Medicine, African Affairs, International Journal of Social Welfare and The Journal of Modern African Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact