Tom Dobber

1.5k citations
29 papers · 859 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Dobber

26 papers receiving 798 citations

Peers

Tom Dobber
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Communication 386
  • Sociology and Political Science 462
  • Safety Research 70
  • Artificial Intelligence 253
  • Political Science and International Relations 135
Replace Alvin Zhou with:
Alvin Zhou United States
Aleksandra Urman Switzerland
Nili Steinfeld Israel
Toby Hopp United States
Gaurav Sood United States
Ysabel Gerrard United Kingdom
Joëlle Swart Netherlands
Raymond J. Pingree United States
Cornelia Mothes Germany
JungHwan Yang United States
Tom Dobber relative to Alvin Zhou United States Alvin Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Alvin Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Dobber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Dobber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Dobber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Dobber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Dobber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Dobber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Dobber. The network helps show where Tom Dobber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Tom Dobber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Dobber Line = papers co-authored together Tom Dobber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018199
2 2020141
3 2020129
4 201952
5 201743
6 202238
7 202235
8 201826
9 201920
10 202319
11 202318
12 202216
13 202316
14 202312
15
Towards Unfair Political Practices Law: Learning lessons from the regulation of unfair commercial practices for online political advertising
202112
16 202411
17 202011
18 202311
19 202111
20 202110

About Tom Dobber

Tom Dobber is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 29 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (17 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (14 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (8 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Media Influence and Politics (3 papers) and Freedom of Expression and Defamation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (386 citations), Sociology and Political Science (462 citations), Safety Research (70 citations), Artificial Intelligence (253 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (135 citations). Tom Dobber has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Claes H. de Vreese, Natali Helberger, Damian Trilling, R. Ó Fathaigh, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Sanne Kruikemeier, Brahim Zarouali, Nadia Metoui, Guy De Pauw and Kristina Irion. Their work appears in journals such as Internet Policy Review, Computers in Human Behavior, New Media & Society, Big Data & Society and European Journal of Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact