Tom Collier

1.1k citations
25 papers · 922 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Collier

23 papers receiving 889 citations

Peers

Tom Collier
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Biophysics 269
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 414
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 23
  • Periodontics 66
  • Biomedical Engineering 317
Replace Kung‐Bin Sung with:
Kung‐Bin Sung Taiwan
Kirk W. Gossage United States
Arjen Amelink Netherlands
Sadru P. Kabani United States
Iouri Boiko United States
W. Matthew White United States
Dawn L. Nida United States
Sung Keun Chang United States
Melanie C. Grossman United States
Dimitris S. Gorpas Germany
Tom Collier relative to Kung‐Bin Sung Taiwan Kung‐Bin Sung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Kung‐Bin Sung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Collier. The network helps show where Tom Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Collier Line = papers co-authored together Tom Collier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007150
2 2000103
3 2002103
4
Confocal microscopy for real-time detection of oral cavity neoplasia.
200377
5 200375
6 200561
7 200054
8 200553
9 199851
10 200247
11 200745
12 200227
13 200223
14 200511
15
Detection of dysplasia with near real time confocal microscopy.
200210
16 19987
17 20026
18 20046
19 20056
20 20022

About Tom Collier

Tom Collier is a scholar working on Biophysics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Periodontics, Epidemiology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (14 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), AI in cancer detection (6 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (4 papers), Oral Health Pathology and Treatment (3 papers) and Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (269 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (414 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (23 citations), Periodontics (66 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (317 citations). Tom Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Rae Richards-Kortum, Michele M. Follen, Anais L. Malpica, Rebekah Anna Drezek, Reuben Lotan, Kung‐Bin Sung, Michael R. Descour, Dizem Arifler, Konstantin Sokolov and Ann Marie Gillenwater. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Optics, Optics Express, Journal of Microscopy, Gynecologic Oncology and Academic Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact