Todd Eavis

492 citations
36 papers · 361 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Todd Eavis

35 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Todd Eavis
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Signal Processing 229
  • Computer Networks and Communications 309
  • Information Systems 167
  • Artificial Intelligence 78
  • Computational Mathematics 1
Replace Mohamed H. Ali with:
Mohamed H. Ali United States
Mert Akdere United States
Neal Sample United States
Stratos Papadomanolakis United States
Alberto Lerner Switzerland
Gérard Wagener Luxembourg
Ľubor Kollár United States
Ashish Kumar Gupta India
Alexandre Dulaunoy Luxembourg
Todd Eavis relative to Mohamed H. Ali United States Mohamed H. Ali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mohamed H. Ali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Todd Eavis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Eavis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Eavis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Eavis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Eavis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Eavis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Eavis. The network helps show where Todd Eavis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Todd Eavis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Todd Eavis Line = papers co-authored together Todd Eavis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200441
2 200632
3 200131
4 200326
5 200219
6 200715
7 200714
8 200013
9 200113
10 200112
11 200812
12 200811
13 200711
14 200611
15 200411
16 20099
17 20058
18 20068
19 20077
20 20087

About Todd Eavis

Todd Eavis is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Database Systems and Queries (33 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (31 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (10 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (10 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (5 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers) and Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (229 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (309 citations), Information Systems (167 citations), Artificial Intelligence (78 citations) and Computational Mathematics (1 citation). Todd Eavis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Saudi Arabia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Rau‐Chaplin, Frank Dehne, Fabian Gregor Dehne, Ying Chen, Susanne E. Hambrusch, Nathalie Japkowicz, Xi Zheng, Elankayer Sithirasenan, Anisoara Nica and Nasser Taleb. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining, Distributed and Parallel Databases, Lecture notes in computer science, Data Science Journal and Future Generation Computer Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact