Tine Nymark

564 citations
22 papers · 414 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Tine Nymark

22 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Tine Nymark
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 72
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 26
  • Surgery 190
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 42
  • Emergency Medicine 17
Replace Matthew Rg Menon with:
Matthew Rg Menon Canada
Stefan Suttner Germany
Ji Su Jang South Korea
A W Lambert United Kingdom
Oliver Bagshaw United Kingdom
Hubert A. Benzon United States
Gianluca Cappelleri Italy
Thomas Schraner Switzerland
Eva Samnegård Sweden
Anna Mezzacasa Switzerland
Tine Nymark relative to Matthew Rg Menon Canada Matthew Rg Menon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Matthew Rg Menon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tine Nymark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tine Nymark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tine Nymark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tine Nymark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tine Nymark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tine Nymark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tine Nymark. The network helps show where Tine Nymark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tine Nymark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tine Nymark Line = papers co-authored together Tine Nymark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200684
2 200661
3 200846
4 200536
5 201727
6 200625
7 200621
8 201819
9 201619
10 202116
11 201414
12 201712
13
[Diagnosis and procedure coding in relation to the DRG system].
20038
14 20227
15 20175
16 20244
17 20244
18 20222
19 20251
20 20241

About Tine Nymark

Tine Nymark is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Oncology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (2 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (2 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (2 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (72 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (26 citations), Surgery (190 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (42 citations) and Emergency Medicine (17 citations). Tine Nymark has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Niels Dieter Röck, Ole Ovesen, Bernard Jeune, Jens Lauritsen, Søren Overgaard, Jesper Hallas, Morten Andersen, Michael Mørk Petersen, David Gaist and Ioannis Tsiropoulos. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Orthopaedica, Acta Oncologica, Hip International, European Journal of Epidemiology and EFORT Open Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact