Tim D. Day

411 citations
17 papers · 246 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 8
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 8
    • Avian ecology and behavior 2
    • Leptospirosis research and findings 3

Tim D. Day

16 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers

Tim D. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Ecology 169
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 47
  • Insect Science 46
  • Parasitology 24
  • Small Animals 26
Replace Kyle D. Gustafson with:
Kyle D. Gustafson United States
Elaine L. Gill United Kingdom
Oscar Skewes Chile
Tim J. Lowe Australia
Gerald D. Lindsey United States
José Alió Venezuela
Sip E. van Wieren Netherlands
John McIlroy Australia
Paul W. Bright United Kingdom
Ana M. Valente Portugal
Tim D. Day relative to Kyle D. Gustafson United States Kyle D. Gustafson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kyle D. Gustafson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim D. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim D. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim D. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim D. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim D. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim D. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim D. Day. The network helps show where Tim D. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Tim D. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim D. Day Line = papers co-authored together Tim D. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200932
2
PEST ERADICATION TECHNOLOGY – THE CRITICAL PARTNER TO PEST EXCLUSION TECHNOLOGY: THE MAUNGATAUTARI EXPERIENCE
200730
3 201129
4
Multiple-species exclusion fencing and technology for mainland sites
200727
5 200319
6 201118
7 199815
8 200014
9 199714
10 199513
11
Efficacy of bird repellents at deterring North Island robins (Petroica australis longipes) and tomtits (P. macrocephala toitoi) from baits
201411
12 200011
13 19976
14 20004
15 20241
16 19981
17 19541

About Tim D. Day

Tim D. Day is a scholar working on Ecology, Parasitology, Small Animals, Insect Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 17 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (8 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Leptospirosis research and findings (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (169 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (47 citations), Insect Science (46 citations), Parasitology (24 citations) and Small Animals (26 citations). Tim D. Day has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine O’Connor, Lindsay R. Matthews, Joseph R. Waas, J. R. Waas, Carolyn M. King, B. Kay Clapperton, John Innes, A.J. Pearson, Lisa Matthews and N. R. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wildlife Diseases, New Zealand Veterinary Journal, Wildlife Research, Pest Management Science and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact