Thorsten Botz–Bornstein

460 citations
60 papers · 162 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thorsten Botz–Bornstein

45 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers

Thorsten Botz–Bornstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
  • Cultural Studies 32
  • Museology 10
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
  • Geography, Planning and Development 11
Replace Élizabeth Harvey with:
Élizabeth Harvey United Kingdom
Suzanne Guerlac United States
George Eliot
Peėter Torop Estonia
Annette Wieviorka France
Peter Hawkins United Kingdom
Garrett Stewart United States
Mary Jacobus United States
Elizabeth Rottenberg United States
Ronald M. Radano United States
Thorsten Botz–Bornstein relative to Élizabeth Harvey United Kingdom Élizabeth Harvey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Élizabeth Harvey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thorsten Botz–Bornstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thorsten Botz–Bornstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thorsten Botz–Bornstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thorsten Botz–Bornstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thorsten Botz–Bornstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thorsten Botz–Bornstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thorsten Botz–Bornstein. The network helps show where Thorsten Botz–Bornstein may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201317
2
What is the Difference Between Culture and Civilization?: Two Hundred Fifty Years of Confusion
201210
3
The Cool-Kawaii: Afro-Japanese Aesthetics and New World Modernity
201010
4 20068
5
WANG Shu and the Possibilities of Architectural regionalism in China
20137
6
Place and Dream: Japan and the Virtual
20046
7 20175
8 20145
9
Vasily Sesemann: Experience, Formalism, and the Question of Being
20065
10 20065
11 20164
12
Films and dreams : Tarkovsky, Bergman, Sokurov, Kubrick, and Wong Kar-wai
20084
13 20084
14
What Does It Mean To Be Cool
20103
15 20143
16 20103
17 20063
18 19973
19 20153
20 20123

About Thorsten Botz–Bornstein

Thorsten Botz–Bornstein is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 162 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers), Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers) and Philosophical and Historical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations), Cultural Studies (32 citations), Museology (10 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (11 citations). Thorsten Botz–Bornstein has collaborated with scholars based in Kuwait, United States and China. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Asian Philosophy, Angelaki, SubStance and Environment and Planning D Society and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact