Thomas van Dijk

796 citations
30 papers · 638 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas van Dijk

26 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

Thomas van Dijk
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 59
  • Biophysics 118
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 260
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 140
  • Biomedical Engineering 275
Replace Weiqian Zhao with:
Weiqian Zhao China
Satish Kumar Dubey India
P. Scott Carney United States
Xiaohua Feng Singapore
Ines Latka Germany
Yong Meng Sua United States
M. Fernandez Alonso Spain
Jeremy Rowlette United States
Jiancheng Lai China
Thomas van Dijk relative to Weiqian Zhao China Weiqian Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Weiqian Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas van Dijk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas van Dijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas van Dijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas van Dijk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas van Dijk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas van Dijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas van Dijk. The network helps show where Thomas van Dijk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas van Dijk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas van Dijk Line = papers co-authored together Thomas van Dijk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013126
2 201098
3 201749
4 201344
5 200937
6 201532
7 201032
8 200828
9 201027
10 201124
11 201421
12 201020
13 201916
14 202214
15 201713
16 201713
17 201312
18 202310
19 20138
20 20106

About Thomas van Dijk

Thomas van Dijk is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Biophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 30 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (7 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (6 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (5 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (3 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (3 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (59 citations), Biophysics (118 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (260 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (140 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (275 citations). Thomas van Dijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Taco D. Visser, Rohit Bhargava, David G. Fischer, Emil Wolf, David Mayerich, Matthew V. Schulmerich, P. Scott Carney, P. Scott Carney, Brent M. DeVetter and Catherine J. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics Express, Journal of Biophotonics, Physical Review Letters and Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact