Thomas Van Brussel

56 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Van Brussel
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 213
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 72
  • Developmental Neuroscience 41
  • Nephrology 66
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 253
Replace Ehrenfried Schindler with:
Ehrenfried Schindler Germany
Charles F. Barish United States
Shin Kurosawa Japan
A. F. Hammerle Austria
Sten Blomquist Sweden
J Lindhagen Sweden
Mamoru Takeuchi Japan
Caveh Madjdpour Switzerland
Nazmi Narın Türkiye
T. Holmin Sweden
Thomas Van Brussel relative to Ehrenfried Schindler Germany Ehrenfried Schindler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Ehrenfried Schindler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Van Brussel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Van Brussel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Van Brussel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Van Brussel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Van Brussel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Van Brussel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Van Brussel. The network helps show where Thomas Van Brussel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Van Brussel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Van Brussel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Van Brussel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990180
2 198880
3 199869
4 201355
5 199346
6 199645
7 202044
8 201144
9 202243
10 199643
11 202342
12 199640
13 201339
14 199231
15 199631
16 201629
17 201427
18 201926
19 202226
20 198925

About Thomas Van Brussel

Thomas Van Brussel is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Nephrology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (10 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (9 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (7 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (213 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (72 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (41 citations), Nephrology (66 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (253 citations). Thomas Van Brussel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Lawin, Gisbert Knichwitz, T. Möllhoff, Hugo Van Aken, Diether Lambrechts, Hugo K. Van Aken, Jake J. Thiessen, G. Vigfusson, Paul P. Lunkenheimer and J. Rötker. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Critical Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact