Thomas Strohm

634 citations
19 papers · 305 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Strohm

17 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Thomas Strohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Condensed Matter Physics 160
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 87
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 90
  • Artificial Intelligence 82
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 26
Replace Zhaoyu Han with:
Zhaoyu Han United States
J. M. Singer Switzerland
Wenjian Hu United States
Chenyi Shen China
G. Abramovici France
Nitin Prasad United States
Rakesh P. Tiwari Switzerland
Andrew S. Darmawan Japan
Abdelkrim Zitouni Tunisia
C. Palermo France
Thomas Strohm relative to Zhaoyu Han United States Zhaoyu Han's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Zhaoyu Han · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Strohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Strohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Strohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Strohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Strohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Strohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Strohm. The network helps show where Thomas Strohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Strohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Strohm Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Strohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 199866
2 199755
3 201653
4 202349
5 199719
6 199814
7 199610
8 20219
9 19986
10 19974
11 20224
12 20244
13 19974
14 20203
15 20232
16 20222
17 20221
18 20240
19 20250

About Thomas Strohm

Thomas Strohm is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (6 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (4 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (4 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (3 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (2 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (160 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (87 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (90 citations), Artificial Intelligence (82 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (26 citations). Thomas Strohm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include M. Cardona, Viktor G. Hadjiev, Xingjiang Zhou, C. W. Chu, Christopher Huth, Tim Güneysu, René Guillaume, Wolfgang P. Schleich, Florian Dommert and Johannes Klepsch. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physical review. A, Physical Review Letters, Quantum Science and Technology and EPJ Quantum Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact