Thomas Strache

25 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Thomas Strache
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Structural Biology 23
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 210
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 347
  • Condensed Matter Physics 128
  • Computational Mechanics 101
Replace M. Tekielak with:
M. Tekielak Poland
P. Mazalski Poland
K. Koike Japan
C. Hassel Germany
Jon Ander Arregi Czechia
Z. Kurant Poland
M. V. Gomoyunova Russia
Martin Weisheit Germany
Darryl Shima United States
Le Thanh Vinh France
Thomas Strache relative to M. Tekielak Poland M. Tekielak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
M. Tekielak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Strache

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Strache's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Strache with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Strache more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Strache

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Strache. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Strache. The network helps show where Thomas Strache may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Strache, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Strache Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Strache links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200974
2 201357
3 201842
4 201640
5 200835
6 201035
7 200834
8 200928
9 201128
10 201020
11 200919
12 201116
13 200916
14 201314
15 201013
16 201012
17 201110
18 201210
19 20129
20 20128

About Thomas Strache

Thomas Strache is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (17 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (6 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (6 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers), ZnO doping and properties (4 papers) and Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (23 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (210 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (347 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (128 citations) and Computational Mechanics (101 citations). Thomas Strache has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and India. Frequent co-authors include J. Faßbender, Sebastian Wintz, Jeffrey McCord, K. Lenz, Maciej Oskar Liedke, Ingolf Mönch, Michael Körner, Mie Marsilius, Christian Polak and G. Herzer. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review B, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact