Thomas Saller

34 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

Thomas Saller
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 371
  • Developmental Neuroscience 76
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 84
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 14
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 67
Replace Nandakumar Nagaraja with:
Nandakumar Nagaraja United States
Laura Max United States
Anastasia Borozdina Italy
Christina Boncyk United States
Elizabeth P. Mahanna United States
Nobuto Nakanishi Japan
Senthil Packiasabapathy United States
Gianfranco Di Nino Italy
Julius J. Grunow Germany
Michelle Humeidan United States
Thomas Saller relative to Nandakumar Nagaraja United States Nandakumar Nagaraja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Nandakumar Nagaraja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Saller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Saller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Saller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Saller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Saller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Saller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Saller. The network helps show where Thomas Saller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Saller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Saller Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Saller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020134
2 201394
3 201954
4 202052
5 201847
6 201841
7 201932
8 202323
9 201921
10 202216
11 201915
12 201615
13 202012
14 202212
15 202212
16 202012
17 202011
18 20188
19 20206
20 20215

About Thomas Saller

Thomas Saller is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 37 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (22 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (371 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (76 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (84 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (14 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (67 citations). Thomas Saller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Chappell, Vera von Dossow, Markus Rehm, Matthias Jacob, Klaus Hofmann‐Kiefer, Alasdair M. J. MacLullich, Ulrich Welsch, Bernhard F. Becker, Cynthia Olotu and Simon Schaefer. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, Journal of Clinical Medicine, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Trials and Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact