Thomas Rieder

6 papers receiving 83 citations

Peers

Thomas Rieder
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 32
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 17
  • Rehabilitation 13
  • Developmental Neuroscience 7
  • Signal Processing 15
Replace Charles Allen with:
Charles Allen United States
D. Hernandez-Contreras Mexico
Eugenio Serra Italy
David Landers United States
Ngoc Quynh Nguyen Vietnam
Valentin Vielzeuf France
Ashish Arora United States
Hao Tan United States
Aneeq Zia United States
Thomas Rieder relative to Charles Allen United States Charles Allen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Charles Allen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Rieder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Rieder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Rieder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Rieder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Rieder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Rieder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Rieder. The network helps show where Thomas Rieder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Rieder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Rieder Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Rieder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 200936
2 201526
3 199013
4 20218
5
[Physical performance in antihypertensive therapy. Results of a calcium antagonist-beta blocker combination].
19872
6 19891

About Thomas Rieder

Thomas Rieder is a scholar working on Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Rehabilitation and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 6 papers that have together received 86 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1 paper), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1 paper), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (1 paper), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (1 paper), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (32 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (17 citations), Rehabilitation (13 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (7 citations) and Signal Processing (15 citations). Thomas Rieder has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Edgar Weippl, Johanna Ullrich, Katharina Krombholz, Peter Frühwirt, Wilfried Kindermann, Christian Prinz, Bruno Neu, Esther Herberich, Ewert Schulte‐Frohlinde and Philipp Thies. Their work appears in journals such as Microvascular Research, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, International Journal of Sports Medicine and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact