Thomas Plötz
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
-
- Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Papers in
- Surgery 8
- Pancreatic function and diabetes 8
- Co-authors
- Sigurd Lenzen (10 shared papers)Anne Jörns (5 shared papers)Ilir Mehmeti (5 shared papers)Matthias Elsner (3 shared papers)Ewa Gurgul-Convey (2 shared papers)Attilio Pingitore (1 shared paper)Shanta J. Persaud (1 shared paper)Dimitrios Tsikas (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nutrition and Diabetes (2 papers)Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease (2 papers)The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry (1 paper)Nutrition & Metabolism (1 paper)Diabetologia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Plötz
12 papers receiving 449 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Biochemistry 59
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 72
- Cancer Research 54
- Surgery 153
- Cell Biology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Plötz
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Plötz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Plötz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Plötz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Plötz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Plötz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Plötz. The network helps show where Thomas Plötz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Plötz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 1 |
About Thomas Plötz
Thomas Plötz is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cell Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (8 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (2 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (2 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (2 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (1 paper), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (59 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (72 citations), Cancer Research (54 citations), Surgery (153 citations) and Cell Biology (54 citations). Thomas Plötz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sigurd Lenzen, Anne Jörns, Ilir Mehmeti, Matthias Elsner, Ewa Gurgul-Convey, Attilio Pingitore, Shanta J. Persaud, Dimitrios Tsikas, Markus H. Gräler and S Lortz. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition and Diabetes, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, Nutrition & Metabolism and Diabetologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.