Thomas Pintaric

690 citations
11 papers · 294 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Pintaric

11 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Thomas Pintaric
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Human-Computer Interaction 119
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 175
  • Rehabilitation 50
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 21
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 27
Replace Kevin Desai with:
Kevin Desai United States
Sang-Hack Jung United States
Laura Arns United States
Rowel Atienza Philippines
Mikko Kytö Finland
Gregory Dawe United States
Tse–Yu Pan Taiwan
Pei-Ying Chiang Taiwan
Huimin Liu China
Biao Xie United States
Thomas Pintaric relative to Kevin Desai United States Kevin Desai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Kevin Desai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pintaric

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pintaric's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pintaric with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pintaric more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pintaric

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pintaric. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pintaric. The network helps show where Thomas Pintaric may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pintaric, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Pintaric Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Pintaric links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201184
2 200068
3 201143
4 200542
5 200417
6 200815
7 200413
8
Fundamentals of Ubiquitous Tracking
20044
9
Integrating Studierstube and DWARF
20034
10 20082
11
Fundamentals of Ubiquitous Tracking for Augmented Reality
20032

About Thomas Pintaric

Thomas Pintaric is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Networks and Communications, Rehabilitation and Signal Processing, having authored 11 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (2 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers) and Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (119 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (175 citations), Rehabilitation (50 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (21 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (27 citations). Thomas Pintaric has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hannes Kaufmann, Christian Schönauer, Ulrich Neumann, Albert Rizzo, Stephanie Jansen-Kosterink, Miriam Vollenbroek-Hutten, Dieter Schmalstieg, Asa MacWilliams, Joseph Newman and Martin Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as IEE Review, mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) and University of Twente Research Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact