Thomas O’Rourke
Impact in
- Hepatology top 1%
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Oncology top 5%
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Papers in
- Surgery 6
- Management of metastatic bone disease 2
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 2
-
- Brain Metastases and Treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Fenella K.S. Welsh (1 shared paper)Paris Tekkis (1 shared paper)Timothy G. John (1 shared paper)Myrddin Rees (1 shared paper)Patricia A. Cornett (2 shared papers)C. George (2 shared papers)Russell W. Strong (2 shared papers)David B. Spring (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)Australasian Journal of Dermatology (1 paper)The American Journal of Surgery (1 paper)ANZ Journal of Surgery (1 paper)Annals of Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas O’Rourke
9 papers receiving 885 citations
Thomas O’Rourke's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Hepatology 580
- Oncology 649
- Surgery 431
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 245
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 101
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas O’Rourke
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas O’Rourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas O’Rourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas O’Rourke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas O’Rourke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas O’Rourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas O’Rourke. The network helps show where Thomas O’Rourke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas O’Rourke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluation of Long-term Survival After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 786 |
| 2 | 1986 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 1 |
About Thomas O’Rourke
Thomas O’Rourke is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Hepatology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (2 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (2 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (580 citations), Oncology (649 citations), Surgery (431 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (245 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (101 citations). Thomas O’Rourke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fenella K.S. Welsh, Paris Tekkis, Timothy G. John, Myrddin Rees, Patricia A. Cornett, C. George, Russell W. Strong, David B. Spring, David F. Sobel and Karl E. Friedl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Australasian Journal of Dermatology, The American Journal of Surgery, ANZ Journal of Surgery and Annals of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.