Thomas Nail
Impact in
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Medicine 2
- Co-authors
- Joshua Stanley Hanan (2 shared papers)Nicolae Morar (3 shared papers)Daniel Smith (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Foucault Studies (3 papers)SubStance (2 papers)Angelaki (2 papers)Contemporary Political Theory (1 paper)Distinktion Journal of Social Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Thomas Nail
48 papers receiving 845 citations
Thomas Nail's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Geography, Planning and Development 117
- Cultural Studies 95
- Sociology and Political Science 466
- Urban Studies 50
- Political Science and International Relations 187
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Nail
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Nail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Nail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Nail more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Nail
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Nail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Nail. The network helps show where Thomas Nail may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Nail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 147 | |
| 2 | What is an Assemblage? Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 143 |
| 3 | 2019 | 140 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 129 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 109 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 5 |
About Thomas Nail
Thomas Nail is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 62 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (5 papers), Anarchism and Radical Politics (3 papers), Political theory and Gramsci (2 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers), Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration (2 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (117 citations), Cultural Studies (95 citations), Sociology and Political Science (466 citations), Urban Studies (50 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (187 citations). Thomas Nail has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Joshua Stanley Hanan, Nicolae Morar and Daniel Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Foucault Studies, SubStance, Angelaki, Contemporary Political Theory and Distinktion Journal of Social Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.