Thomas N. Bisson
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Arthur Goldhammer (1 shared paper)John F. Benton (1 shared paper)Gabrielle M. Spiegel (1 shared paper)Georges Duby (1 shared paper)Joseph R. Strayer (1 shared paper)Joseph F. O’Callaghan (1 shared paper)John Bell Henneman (1 shared paper)Charles T. Wood (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (14 papers)Speculum (11 papers)Past & Present (2 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)French History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Thomas N. Bisson
44 papers receiving 539 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Classics 395
- History 425
- History and Philosophy of Science 51
- Political Science and International Relations 209
- Anthropology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas N. Bisson
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas N. Bisson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas N. Bisson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas N. Bisson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas N. Bisson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas N. Bisson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas N. Bisson. The network helps show where Thomas N. Bisson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Thomas N. Bisson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 108 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 94 | |
| 3 | Medieval statecraft and the perspectives of history | 1971 | 82 |
| 4 | 2009 | 67 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 60 | |
| 6 | 1965 | 34 | |
| 7 | 1977 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1976 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 28 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1957 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1966 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 10 |
About Thomas N. Bisson
Thomas N. Bisson is a scholar working on History, Classics, Political Science and International Relations, Archeology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Iberian Studies (11 papers), Medieval Literature and History (9 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Iberia (8 papers), Medieval History and Crusades (6 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (5 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (395 citations), History (425 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (51 citations), Political Science and International Relations (209 citations) and Anthropology (71 citations). Thomas N. Bisson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Arthur Goldhammer, John F. Benton, Gabrielle M. Spiegel, Georges Duby, Joseph R. Strayer, Joseph F. O’Callaghan, John Bell Henneman, Charles T. Wood, Joseph Ziegler and John Mundy. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Speculum, Past & Present, The English Historical Review and French History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.