Thomas Mulier

494 citations
10 papers · 365 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Mulier

10 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Thomas Mulier
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 290
  • Rehabilitation 62
  • Surgery 221
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 49
  • Developmental Biology 6
Replace Ornusa Chalayon with:
Ornusa Chalayon United States
Jim Fitzgerald United Kingdom
Chandra Pasapula United Kingdom
Lowell H. Gill United States
V. Dhukaram United Kingdom
Jeffrey S. Boberg United States
Wouter Sioen Belgium
S. Parsons United Kingdom
Z. Csukonyi France
Louis Samuel Barouk France
Thomas Mulier relative to Ornusa Chalayon United States Ornusa Chalayon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ornusa Chalayon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Mulier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Mulier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Mulier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Mulier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Mulier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Mulier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Mulier. The network helps show where Thomas Mulier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Mulier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Mulier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Mulier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2002136
2 199982
3
Radiographic analysis of anatomical risk factors for Kienböck's disease.
200436
4 200329
5 199527
6
Occult fracture of the trapezoid bone: a report on two cases.
200415
7 201013
8
Severe lisfranc injuries: primary arthrodesis of ORIF?
200212
9
Radiographic analysis of anatomic risk factors for scapholunate dissociation.
200311
10 20104

About Thomas Mulier

Thomas Mulier is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (4 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (2 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (2 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (1 paper) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (290 citations), Rehabilitation (62 citations), Surgery (221 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (49 citations) and Developmental Biology (6 citations). Thomas Mulier has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Greta Dereymaeker, Paul Broos, Luc De Smet, Louis Peeraer, Wouter Sioen, Filip Rega, Pierre Moens, Stefaan Nijs, Guy Molenaers and Guy Fabry. Their work appears in journals such as Foot & Ankle International, Foot and Ankle Surgery, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact