Thomas Morrow

175 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Thomas Morrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Physiology 2.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 797
  • Neurology 346
  • Sensory Systems 202
Replace J. M. Besson with:
J. M. Besson France
David J. McAdoo United States
Robert G. Shulman United States
W. D. M. Paton United Kingdom
J. M. Ritchie United States
Roderic G. Eckenhoff United States
R. J. Miller United States
Nicholas P. Franks United Kingdom
Maria Erecińska United States
C. S. Patlak United States
Thomas Morrow relative to J. M. Besson France J. M. Besson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
J. M. Besson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Morrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Morrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Morrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Morrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Morrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Morrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Morrow. The network helps show where Thomas Morrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Morrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Morrow Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Morrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 182 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994410
2 1996381
3 1998262
4 1997229
5 2004221
6 2002181
7 1972150
8 2000142
9 2001117
10 2008114
11
Defining the difference: What Makes Biologics Unique.
2004100
12 200996
13 199182
14 199681
15 198975
16 200473
17 200072
18 198372
19 198869
20 197369

About Thomas Morrow

Thomas Morrow is a scholar working on Physiology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 182 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (37 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (19 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (14 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (14 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (10 papers), Laser Design and Applications (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (2.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (797 citations), Neurology (346 citations) and Sensory Systems (202 citations). Thomas Morrow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth L. Casey, Satoshi Minoshima, K. L. Casey, Pamela E. Paulson, Robert A. Koeppe, Ahmad Beydoun, Peter Svensson, W. G. Graham, K. L. Berger and Kirk A. Frey. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Neurophysiology, Brain Research, Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact