Thomas Lew

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Lew
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 162
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 66
  • Infectious Diseases 212
  • Neurology 168
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 321
Replace Waleed Ahmed with:
Waleed Ahmed Egypt
Kevin W. Sexton United States
Zui‐Shen Yen Taiwan
Alessandro Borri Italy
Afshin Mohammadi Iran
J.M. Daly United States
Christopher A. Rinaldi United Kingdom
Fred Kusumoto United States
James C. Ross United States
Walid I. Saliba United States
Thomas Lew relative to Waleed Ahmed Egypt Waleed Ahmed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.0×
Waleed Ahmed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lew. The network helps show where Thomas Lew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lew Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003317
2 2022126
3 1997108
4 199838
5 199836
6 199336
7 202036
8 200933
9
Diabetes insipidus in neurosurgical patients.
199832
10 202226
11 200825
12
Outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury managed on a standardised head injury protocol.
199823
13 199823
14 201022
15 202221
16 201312
17 199512
18 202012
19
Decision analytic approach to severe head injury management.
199911
20 202310

About Thomas Lew

Thomas Lew is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Neurology, Control and Systems Engineering and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (8 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (5 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (4 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers), Risk and Portfolio Optimization (3 papers) and Fault Detection and Control Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (162 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (66 citations), Infectious Diseases (212 citations), Neurology (168 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (321 citations). Thomas Lew has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Marco Pavone, Riccardo Bonalli, Wonshill Koh, Tong Kiat Kwek, Taylor P. Reynolds, Danylo Malyuta, Michael Szmuk, Behçet Açıkmeşe, Mark Y. H. Chow and B. C. Ong. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Anesthesia & Analgesia, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Critical Care and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact