Thomas Lapole

1.4k citations
88 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Lapole

82 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Lapole
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 460
  • Neurology 133
  • Rehabilitation 68
  • Biomedical Engineering 404
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 173
Replace M. Pensini with:
M. Pensini France
Gregory E. P. Pearcey Canada
Callum G. Brownstein United Kingdom
Emma Ross United Kingdom
Massimiliano Gobbo Italy
John Temesi Canada
Matt S. Stock United States
Yves Ballay France
Marc Jubeau France
Tejin Yoon United States
Thomas Lapole relative to M. Pensini France M. Pensini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
M. Pensini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lapole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lapole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lapole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lapole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lapole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lapole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lapole. The network helps show where Thomas Lapole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lapole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lapole Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lapole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201797
2 201048
3 201643
4 201941
5 201740
6 201734
7 201430
8 201230
9
The Acute Effect of Local Vibration As a Recovery Modality from Exercise-Induced Increased Muscle Stiffness.
201629
10 201728
11 201627
12 201426
13 201724
14 202122
15 201920
16 201420
17 201919
18 201717
19 201317
20 201216

About Thomas Lapole

Thomas Lapole is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (38 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (18 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (16 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (15 papers), Sports Performance and Training (15 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (13 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (10 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (460 citations), Neurology (133 citations), Rehabilitation (68 citations), Biomedical Engineering (404 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (173 citations). Thomas Lapole has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Guillaume Y. Millet, Robin Souron, Chantal Pérot, Thibault Besson, Vianney Rozand, Léonard Féasson, Michel Petitjean, Antoine Nordez, Stéphane Baudry and Callum G. Brownstein. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Applied Physiology, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Frontiers in Physiology, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact