Thomas Jacobs

488 citations
14 papers · 224 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Jacobs

12 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers

Thomas Jacobs
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Social Sciences 42
  • Development 17
  • Communication 32
  • Political Science and International Relations 72
  • Public Administration 8
Replace Sophie Mützel with:
Sophie Mützel Switzerland
Yanina Welp Switzerland
Lluís Bonet Spain
Bert Hoffmann Germany
Juan M. del Nido United Kingdom
Michael Heseltine United States
Julia R. Azari United States
Lucig H. Danielian United States
Alain Minc France
Quentin Kidd United States
Thomas Jacobs relative to Sophie Mützel Switzerland Sophie Mützel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Sophie Mützel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Jacobs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Jacobs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Jacobs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Jacobs. The network helps show where Thomas Jacobs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Jacobs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Jacobs Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Jacobs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2019106
2 201734
3 202228
4 201820
5 201810
6 20228
7 20205
8 20224
9 20213
10
The language diplomats speak : a discourse-theoretical approach to the negotiations in the EURONEST parliamentary assembly
20162
11 20202
12 20202
13 20250
14 20180

About Thomas Jacobs

Thomas Jacobs is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Development and General Social Sciences, having authored 14 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Union Policy and Governance (5 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), Marxism and Critical Theory (2 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper), World Trade Organization Law (1 paper) and Educational Research and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (42 citations), Development (17 citations), Communication (32 citations), Political Science and International Relations (72 citations) and Public Administration (8 citations). Thomas Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Niels Gheyle, Ferdi De Ville and Jan Orbie. Their work appears in journals such as JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, Critical Discourse Studies, Journal of Language and Politics, Contemporary Political Theory and Critical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact