Thomas Hong

2.2k citations
53 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hong

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Thomas Hong
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Ophthalmology 903
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 332
  • Sensory Systems 24
  • Epidemiology 160
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 21
Replace Jane Loftus with:
Jane Loftus United Kingdom
James F. Martone United States
Özlem Tök Türkiye
Pelin Yılmazbaş Türkiye
Norman S. Levy United States
Marlene R. Moster United States
Ning Li Wang China
Tammy L. Yanovitch United States
H. Dunbar Hoskins United States
Levent Tök Türkiye
Thomas Hong relative to Jane Loftus United Kingdom Jane Loftus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Jane Loftus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hong. The network helps show where Thomas Hong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hong Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013122
2 2016112
3 201894
4 201493
5 201371
6 201170
7 200960
8 201758
9 201857
10 201355
11 201749
12 201445
13 201940
14 201433
15 201933
16 201331
17 202030
18 202128
19 201326
20 201825

About Thomas Hong

Thomas Hong is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (34 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (9 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers) and Saffron Plant Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (903 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (332 citations), Sensory Systems (24 citations), Epidemiology (160 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (21 citations). Thomas Hong has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Chang, Jie Jin Wang, Geoffrey Broadhead, Kimberly Spooner, Paul Mitchell, Elena Rochtchina, George Burlutsky, Timothy E. Schlub, Wijeyanthy Wijeyakumar and Meidong Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, BMJ Open Ophthalmology and Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact