Thomas Holzer

34 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Thomas Holzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Software 31
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 35
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 29
  • Information Systems 79
  • Control and Systems Engineering 67
Replace Paul R. Garvey with:
Paul R. Garvey United States
Mahmoud Efatmaneshnik Australia
Danling Zhao China
Georgios Kavallieratos Norway
Ali K. Raz United States
Hayley J. Davison Reynolds United States
Paul T. Grogan United States
Mark P. Kaminskiy United States
Homayoon Dezfuli United States
Pau Fonseca i Casas Spain
Thomas Holzer relative to Paul R. Garvey United States Paul R. Garvey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Paul R. Garvey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Holzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Holzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Holzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Holzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Holzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Holzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Holzer. The network helps show where Thomas Holzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Holzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Holzer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Holzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201379
2 201651
3 201442
4 202019
5 201912
6 202110
7 201410
8 20139
9 20189
10 20138
11 20197
12 20187
13 20187
14 20206
15 20186
16 20176
17 20135
18
DoD Comprehensive Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Smart Device Ground Control Station Threat Model
20155
19 20154
20 20174

About Thomas Holzer

Thomas Holzer is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 39 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Assessment and Management (13 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (12 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (4 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (4 papers), Product Development and Customization (3 papers) and Microgrid Control and Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (31 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (35 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (29 citations), Information Systems (79 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (67 citations). Thomas Holzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Eveleigh, Annette Muetze, Thomas A. Mazzuchi, Sarah Sheard, Rebecca S. Crowley, James E. Levin, Johann Bacher and Jonathan W. Arenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Systems Engineering, IEEE Systems Journal, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Engineering Management Journal and Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact