Thomas Hepp

615 citations
15 papers · 477 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hepp

14 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Thomas Hepp
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 204
  • Information Systems 158
  • Internal Medicine 11
  • Management Information Systems 25
  • Computer Networks and Communications 58
Replace Taylor Prewitt with:
Taylor Prewitt United States
Yazan Al-Issa Jordan
Sellappan Palaniappan Malaysia
Yaron Denekamp Israel
Alex Akinbi United Kingdom
Domenico M. Pisanelli Italy
Ståle Walderhaug Norway
Charles N. Mead United States
Ander de Keijzer Netherlands
Dennis Toddenroth Germany
Thomas Hepp relative to Taylor Prewitt United States Taylor Prewitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×36×
Taylor Prewitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hepp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hepp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hepp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hepp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hepp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hepp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hepp. The network helps show where Thomas Hepp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hepp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hepp Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hepp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012162
2 201062
3 201856
4 201840
5 201828
6 201827
7 201422
8 201822
9 201817
10 201112
11 201911
12
VMEXT: A Visualization Tool for Mathematical Expression Trees
201710
13 20197
14 20121
15 20060

About Thomas Hepp

Thomas Hepp is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 15 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (4 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (2 papers), Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security (2 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (2 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (204 citations), Information Systems (158 citations), Internal Medicine (11 citations), Management Information Systems (25 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (58 citations). Thomas Hepp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Béla Gipp, Ekkehart Jenetzky, Timolaos Rizos, Roland Veltkamp, Werner Hacke, Paulus Kirchhof, Peter A. Ringleb, Lars Marquardt, Rüdiger Becker and Christian Hametner. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Translational Stroke Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Cerebrovascular Diseases and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact