Thomas Gillespie

2.8k citations
17 papers · 451 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Gillespie

16 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Thomas Gillespie
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 90
  • Automotive Engineering 126
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 42
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 65
  • Polymers and Plastics 36
Replace Cendrine Gatumel with:
Cendrine Gatumel France
David Vidal Canada
Ann S. Yoshimura United States
Zheng Cao China
Christopher Boggs United States
Z. Kembłowski Poland
C. F. Chan Man Fong Canada
Karl Stephan Germany
Wanli Liu China
Thomas Gillespie relative to Cendrine Gatumel France Cendrine Gatumel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Cendrine Gatumel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gillespie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gillespie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gillespie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gillespie. The network helps show where Thomas Gillespie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gillespie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gillespie Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gillespie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2021158
2 196097
3 198348
4 195934
5 196026
6 196023
7 196213
8 196612
9 201211
10 19976
11 20156
12 19835
13 19625
14 20134
15 19592
16 19761
17 20130

About Thomas Gillespie

Thomas Gillespie is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Automotive Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research (3 papers), Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (3 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (3 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (2 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (2 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (2 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (90 citations), Automotive Engineering (126 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (42 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (65 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (36 citations). Thomas Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Sayers, Bárbara Riegel and Dale Glaser. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Heart & Lung and Journal of Applied Mechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact