Thomas Getty

3.4k citations
62 papers · 2.3k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Getty

61 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Getty
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Developmental Biology 252
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
  • Ecology 674
  • Biological Psychiatry 51
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 248
Replace Stephen H. Vessey with:
Stephen H. Vessey United States
Ton G.G. Groothuis Netherlands
Jae Chun Choe South Korea
John L. Quinn United Kingdom
Tatjana Krama Latvia
Carsten Schradin South Africa
Matthew J. Fuxjager United States
Barbara Taborsky Switzerland
Amy E. M. Newman Canada
Tim W. Fawcett United Kingdom
Thomas Getty relative to Stephen H. Vessey United States Stephen H. Vessey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Stephen H. Vessey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Getty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Getty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Getty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Getty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Getty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Getty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Getty. The network helps show where Thomas Getty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Getty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Getty Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Getty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005173
2 2002161
3 1987161
4 1998122
5 1985108
6 199798
7 200490
8 201976
9 200069
10 199765
11 198964
12 199664
13 198558
14 199354
15 200454
16 201650
17 201849
18 199848
19 199148
20 201943

About Thomas Getty

Thomas Getty is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (35 papers), Plant and animal studies (22 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (12 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (11 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (252 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations), Ecology (674 citations), Biological Psychiatry (51 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (248 citations). Thomas Getty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include H. Ronald Pulliam, Robert Olendorf, Kim T. Scribner, Eben Gering, Dominic Wright, J. R. Krebs, Natalie S. Dubois, Rie Henriksen, Zhi Huang and John M. Petitto. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Behaviour, The American Naturalist, Ecology, Behavioral Ecology and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact