Thomas Getty

3.2k citations
60 papers · 2.5k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Getty

59 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Getty
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Developmental Biology 172
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.3k
  • Ecology 361
  • Genetics 339
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 177
Replace Gerald Borgia with:
Gerald Borgia United States
Theo C. M. Bakker Germany
Nick J. Royle United Kingdom
James Dale New Zealand
Nancy Tyler Burley United States
Oren Hasson Israel
Jacinta C. Beehner United States
J. David Ligon United States
Jae Chun Choe South Korea
Bruce E. Lyon United States
Thomas Getty relative to Gerald Borgia United States Gerald Borgia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gerald Borgia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Getty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Getty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Getty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Getty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Getty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Getty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Getty. The network helps show where Thomas Getty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Getty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Getty Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Getty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011277
2 2005172
3 1987160
4 2002155
5 1998114
6 1985108
7 200489
8 201982
9 200069
10 199765
11 198963
12 199663
13 198558
14 199352
15 200452
16 201649
17 201849
18 201948
19 199145
20 199845

About Thomas Getty

Thomas Getty is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics, Parasitology and Insect Science, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (40 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (6 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (5 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (172 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.3k citations), Ecology (361 citations), Genetics (339 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (177 citations). Thomas Getty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include H. Ronald Pulliam, Robert Olendorf, Kim T. Scribner, Eben Gering, Dominic Wright, John Richard Krebs, Rie Henriksen, Natalie S. Dubois, Jessica E. Rettig and Rebecca C. Fuller. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Animal Behaviour, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Ecology and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact