Thomas Feuring

1.9k citations
47 papers · 1.4k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Feuring

45 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Feuring
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Statistics and Probability 920
  • Management Science and Operations Research 647
  • Modeling and Simulation 204
  • Applied Mathematics 304
  • Control and Systems Engineering 453
Replace B. Asady with:
B. Asady Iran
Xiangfeng Yang China
Andrzej Piegat Poland
Hoàng Việt Long Vietnam
Hsien-Chung Wu Taiwan
Kai Yao China
C. R. Bector Canada
Yuhan Liu China
Yuhong Sheng China
Asad Ali Pakistan
Thomas Feuring relative to B. Asady Iran B. Asady's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
B. Asady · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Feuring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Feuring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Feuring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Feuring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Feuring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Feuring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Feuring. The network helps show where Thomas Feuring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Feuring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Feuring Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Feuring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000354
2 2000193
3 2001190
4 1999151
5 2002115
6 200196
7 200056
8 200230
9 199927
10 199826
11 200123
12
FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS ARE UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATORS
199519
13 199916
14 200016
15 199914
16 200212
17 200111
18 199911
19 200210
20 20027

About Thomas Feuring

Thomas Feuring is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Control and Systems Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (29 papers), Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (29 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (19 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (12 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (6 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (6 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (4 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (920 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (647 citations), Modeling and Simulation (204 citations), Applied Mathematics (304 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (453 citations). Thomas Feuring has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include James J. Buckley, Yoichi Hayashi and Esfandiar Eslami. Their work appears in journals such as Fuzzy Sets and Systems, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, European Journal of Operational Research and Soft Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact