Thomas D. Haggerty

17 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Haggerty
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Gastroenterology 50
  • Infectious Diseases 142
  • Animal Science and Zoology 56
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 66
  • Microbiology 26
Replace Giulia Masetti with:
Giulia Masetti United Kingdom
Daniel Brügger Germany
Anne Lyons Ireland
Adelaide Tawiah Canada
Caroline Reiff United Kingdom
Edgardo Ugarte France
James B. Heneghan United States
Gaorui Bian China
Naeem Ullah China
Thomas D. Haggerty relative to Giulia Masetti United Kingdom Giulia Masetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Giulia Masetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Haggerty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Haggerty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Haggerty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Haggerty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Haggerty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Haggerty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Haggerty. The network helps show where Thomas D. Haggerty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Haggerty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Haggerty Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Haggerty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2009142
2 2006119
3 201773
4 201654
5 200744
6 200538
7 202332
8 202025
9 200424
10 202017
11 202115
12 202210
13 20039
14 20207
15 20107
16 20142
17 20011
18 20200

About Thomas D. Haggerty

Thomas D. Haggerty is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Gastroenterology, Ecology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 18 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (6 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (6 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (2 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (2 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (50 citations), Infectious Diseases (142 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (56 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (66 citations) and Microbiology (26 citations). Thomas D. Haggerty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Julie Parsonnet, Sharon Perry, Charles Y. Chiu, Catherine Ley, Shufang Yang, Donald Ganem, Charles Runckel, Alexander L. Greninger, Joseph L. DeRisi and Maria de la Luz Sanchez. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Gastroenterology, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Journal of Medical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact