Thomas C. Key

826 citations
17 papers · 706 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Key

15 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Key
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 186
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 129
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 319
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 242
  • Toxicology 23
Replace Gilbert I. Martin with:
Gilbert I. Martin United States
John P. Minogue United States
Renate Savich United States
George Blinick United States
Mary Lynne Reuss United States
John I. Fishburne United States
A. C. Davidson United Kingdom
W.A.W. Walters Australia
Patricia Crowley Ireland
Devon Kuehn United States
Thomas C. Key relative to Gilbert I. Martin United States Gilbert I. Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Gilbert I. Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Key

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Key more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Key

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Key. The network helps show where Thomas C. Key may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Key, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Key Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Key links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1986228
2 1986213
3 198682
4 198738
5 198332
6 198025
7 198324
8
Osteogenesis imperfecta as a complication of pregnancy.
197819
9 198314
10 198811
11 198811
12 19854
13 19833
14 20201
15 19821
16 19850
17 19850

About Thomas C. Key

Thomas C. Key is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (186 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (129 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (319 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (242 citations) and Toxicology (23 citations). Thomas C. Key has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Moore, Robert Resnik, Edgar O. Horger, Barry T. Bloom, Mikko Hallman, Kurt Benirschke, Heikki Paatero, J Jääskeläinen, T. Allen Merritt and A.‐L. Järvenpää. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New England Journal of Medicine, Anesthesiology, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact