Thomas Broman
Impact in
-
- History of Science and Natural History
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- History top 2%
- History of Medicine Studies
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Papers in
- History 7
- Medical History and Research 3
- Medical History and Innovations 3
-
- History of Science and Medicine 2
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 2
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- History of Science and Natural History 2
- Co-authors
- David Lindenfeld (1 shared paper)Lynn K. Nyhart (2 shared papers)Thomas Neville Bonner (1 shared paper)Lisa Rosner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Osiris (4 papers)History of Science (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Isis (1 paper)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Broman
16 papers receiving 194 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- History and Philosophy of Science 80
- History 99
- General Psychology 11
- Anthropology 70
- Literature and Literary Theory 43
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Broman
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Broman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Broman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Broman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Broman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Broman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Broman. The network helps show where Thomas Broman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Broman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 122 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 11 | Science and civil society | 2002 | 7 |
| 12 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 0 |
About Thomas Broman
Thomas Broman is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), Medical History and Innovations (3 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (80 citations), History (99 citations), General Psychology (11 citations), Anthropology (70 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations). Thomas Broman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Lindenfeld, Lynn K. Nyhart, Thomas Neville Bonner and Lisa Rosner. Their work appears in journals such as Osiris, History of Science, The American Historical Review, Isis and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.