Thomas Barrett

47 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers

Thomas Barrett
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Ecological Modeling 204
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 319
  • Global and Planetary Change 284
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 65
  • Ecology 267
Replace Jeffrey S. White with:
Jeffrey S. White United States
A. Crespí Portugal
Carl Johan Svensson Sweden
Peter R. Evans United Kingdom
Suresh Babu India
Shintaro Abe Japan
Carey Suehs France
Maximilian Pichler Austria
Rebecca Stark United States
Danny Lee United States
Thomas Barrett relative to Jeffrey S. White United States Jeffrey S. White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.8×
Jeffrey S. White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Barrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Barrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Barrett. The network helps show where Thomas Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Barrett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Barrett Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Barrett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000229
2 2002127
3 2004101
4 200488
5 201048
6 200828
7 197420
8 200818
9 198917
10 201315
11 199815
12 199415
13 198815
14 201414
15 200713
16 201412
17
Semantic Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources Using a Knowledge-Based System
200011
18 201510
19 201510
20 20199

About Thomas Barrett

Thomas Barrett is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 924 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (14 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (6 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (4 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (204 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (319 citations), Global and Planetary Change (284 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (65 citations) and Ecology (267 citations). Thomas Barrett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Pressey, Simon Ferrier, Matthew Watts, G. Whish, Shalini Prasad, A. R. E. Sinclair, David M. Forsyth, Denis White, Steven S. Shimozaki and Philip Harber. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Nanomedicine, PM&R, Current Medical Research and Opinion and Journal of Hospital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact