Thomas Badr

484 citations
25 papers · 312 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Badr

22 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Thomas Badr
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 282
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 17
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 117
  • Condensed Matter Physics 22
  • Spectroscopy 21
Replace В. Н. Сорокин with:
В. Н. Сорокин Russia
Chang Yong Park South Korea
M. Chaubet France
A.S. Bell United Kingdom
R. Ohmukai Japan
Shubhashish Datta United States
Changlei Guo China
D. B. Pearson United States
A. P. Chu United States
Thomas Badr relative to В. Н. Сорокин Russia В. Н. Сорокин's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
В. Н. Сорокин · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Badr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Badr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Badr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Badr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Badr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Badr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Badr. The network helps show where Thomas Badr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Badr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Badr Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Badr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202043
2 200340
3 201835
4 200628
5 202224
6 201021
7 200721
8
Probing superfluidity in a quasi two-dimensional Bose gas through its local dynamics
201617
9 200012
10 200812
11 200412
12 201010
13 200110
14 20049
15 20224
16 20173
17 20113
18 20242
19 20102
20 20091

About Thomas Badr

Thomas Badr is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (11 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (8 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (6 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers) and Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (282 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (17 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (117 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (22 citations) and Spectroscopy (21 citations). Thomas Badr has collaborated with scholars based in France, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P. Juncar, M. Himbert, Mark D. Plimmer, Hélène Perrin, Laurent Longchambon, Romain Dubessy, J.‐J. Zondy, Yann Louyer, A. Perrin and Avinash Kumar. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, The European Physical Journal D, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Optics Letters and New Journal of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact