Thomas Badr

448 citations
25 papers · 303 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Badr

22 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Thomas Badr
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 278
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 16
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 112
  • Condensed Matter Physics 16
  • Spectroscopy 22
Replace Y. Kersalé with:
Y. Kersalé France
В. Н. Сорокин Russia
Chang Yong Park South Korea
Peter F. Herskind Denmark
A.S. Bell United Kingdom
R. Ohmukai Japan
Clément Lacroûte France
M A Gubin Russia
Shubhashish Datta United States
Max Schiemangk Germany
Thomas Badr relative to Y. Kersalé France Y. Kersalé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Y. Kersalé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Badr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Badr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Badr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Badr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Badr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Badr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Badr. The network helps show where Thomas Badr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Badr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Badr Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Badr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202042
2 200340
3 201832
4 200627
5
A versatile ring trap for quantum gases
202120
6 202220
7 200720
8 201019
9 200012
10 200812
11 200411
12 200110
13 20049
14 20109
15 20224
16 20174
17
Detailed study of a transverse field Zeeman slower
20163
18 20113
19 20242
20 20101

About Thomas Badr

Thomas Badr is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Mechanical Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (11 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (10 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (8 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (7 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (6 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (4 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (278 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (16 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (112 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (16 citations) and Spectroscopy (22 citations). Thomas Badr has collaborated with scholars based in France, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include M. Himbert, P. Juncar, M. D. Plimmer, Hélène Perrin, Romain Dubessy, Laurent Longchambon, Yann Louyer, J.‐J. Zondy, Avinash Kumar and A. Perrin. Their work appears in journals such as The European Physical Journal D, Physical review. A, Physical Review A, Review of Scientific Instruments and Optics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact