Thomas Angerer
Impact in
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 1%
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Geophysics top 2%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
Papers in
- Geophysics 28
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 26
- earthquake and tectonic studies 5
-
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis 16
- Co-authors
- Steffen Gerd Hagemann (19 shared papers)Jeffrey L. Mauk (1 shared paper)John L. Walshe (1 shared paper)DAVID P. FRENCH (1 shared paper)Patrick Nadoll (1 shared paper)Leonid V. Danyushevsky (2 shared papers)Detlef Walde (3 shared papers)Paul Duuring (6 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Angerer
34 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Thomas Angerer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Geochemistry and Petrology 566
- Geophysics 947
- Artificial Intelligence 626
- Paleontology 131
- Inorganic Chemistry 67
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Angerer
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Angerer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Angerer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Angerer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Angerer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Angerer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Angerer. The network helps show where Thomas Angerer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Angerer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The chemistry of hydrothermal magnetite: A review Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 499 |
| 2 | 2015 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 8 |
About Thomas Angerer
Thomas Angerer is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology, Paleontology, Artificial Intelligence and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (26 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (16 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (11 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (6 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (5 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (3 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (566 citations), Geophysics (947 citations), Artificial Intelligence (626 citations), Paleontology (131 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (67 citations). Thomas Angerer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Steffen Gerd Hagemann, Jeffrey L. Mauk, John L. Walshe, DAVID P. FRENCH, Patrick Nadoll, Leonid V. Danyushevsky, Detlef Walde, Paul Duuring, Carlos Alberto Rosière and Lydia Maria Lobato. Their work appears in journals such as Ore Geology Reviews, Mineralium Deposita, Economic Geology, Precambrian Research and International Geology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.