Thilo Kober
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 6
-
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 2
- Co-authors
- Douglas G. Altman (1 shared paper)Larissa Shamseer (1 shared paper)Amy C. Plint (1 shared paper)Sofia Dias (1 shared paper)Kenneth F. Schulz (1 shared paper)David Moher (1 shared paper)Laura Weeks (1 shared paper)Lucy Turner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (4 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2 papers)Blood (2 papers)Der Onkologe (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Thilo Kober
9 papers receiving 955 citations
Thilo Kober's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 161
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 313
- Genetics 154
- Oncology 206
- Health Informatics 6
Countries citing papers authored by Thilo Kober
This map shows the geographic impact of Thilo Kober's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thilo Kober with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thilo Kober more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thilo Kober
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thilo Kober. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thilo Kober. The network helps show where Thilo Kober may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thilo Kober, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 545 |
| 2 | 2007 | 280 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 9 | [The German Guideline Clearinghouse on Breast Cancer: the need for frequent updating of breast cancer guidelines requires effective guideline updating procedures]. | 2004 | 1 |
| 10 | 2001 | 0 |
About Thilo Kober
Thilo Kober is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Hematology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Cancer Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (1 paper), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (161 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (313 citations), Genetics (154 citations), Oncology (206 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Thilo Kober has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Douglas G. Altman, Larissa Shamseer, Amy C. Plint, Sofia Dias, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher, Laura Weeks, Lucy Turner, Sven Trelle and Julia Bohlius. Their work appears in journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Blood, Der Onkologe and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.