Tey Meadow

537 citations
15 papers · 362 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media
    • Gender Politics and Representation
    • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Papers in

    • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 9
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media 4
    • Gender Roles and Identity Studies 2
    • Feminist Theory and Gender Studies 2

Tey Meadow

15 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Tey Meadow
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Gender Studies 182
  • Social Psychology 223
  • Reproductive Medicine 61
  • Sociology and Political Science 184
  • Law 24
Replace C. Lynn Carr with:
C. Lynn Carr United States
Esther N. Tebbe United States
Sara L. Crawley United States
Elizabethe Payne United States
José Ignacio Pichardo Galán Spain
Róisín Ryan-Flood United Kingdom
Stephan ie Brzuzy United States
Kate Bornstein
Elizabeth Brake United States
Aren Z. Aizura United States
Tey Meadow relative to C. Lynn Carr United States C. Lynn Carr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. Lynn Carr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tey Meadow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tey Meadow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tey Meadow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tey Meadow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tey Meadow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tey Meadow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tey Meadow. The network helps show where Tey Meadow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Tey Meadow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tey Meadow Line = papers co-authored together Tey Meadow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2018112
2 201079
3 201160
4 201324
5 202017
6 200916
7
Studying Each Other: On Agency, Constraint, and Positionality in the Field
201314
8 201414
9 20178
10 20125
11 20234
12 20164
13 20233
14 20061
15 20191

About Tey Meadow

Tey Meadow is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and History, having authored 15 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (9 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers) and Feminist Theory and Gender Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (182 citations), Social Psychology (223 citations), Reproductive Medicine (61 citations), Sociology and Political Science (184 citations) and Law (24 citations). Tey Meadow has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Judith Stacey, Alexander Borsa and Dingyu Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Gender & Society, Politics & Society, Ethnic and Racial Studies and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact