Tess Dawber

6 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Tess Dawber
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 104
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 175
  • Clinical Psychology 60
  • Applied Psychology 14
  • Social Psychology 44
Replace Ralph A. Gillies with:
Ralph A. Gillies United States
Isabelle Richer Canada
Barry L. Stern United States
Jessamyn G. Perlus United States
Naamith Heiblum United States
Sarah A. Ting United States
Sherri MacKay Canada
Tirzah R. Spencer United States
Michelle L. Ackerman United States
Melissa C. Mercado United States
Tess Dawber relative to Ralph A. Gillies United States Ralph A. Gillies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ralph A. Gillies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tess Dawber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tess Dawber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tess Dawber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tess Dawber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tess Dawber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tess Dawber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tess Dawber. The network helps show where Tess Dawber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Tess Dawber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tess Dawber Line = papers co-authored together Tess Dawber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2000128
2 1998109
3 200460
4 199918
5
A Comparison of Students’ Performance Under Full-Time, Part-Time, and Online Conditions in an Undergraduate Nursing Microbiology Course
200610
6 19983

About Tess Dawber

Tess Dawber is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Plant Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (4 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (104 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (175 citations), Clinical Psychology (60 citations), Applied Psychology (14 citations) and Social Psychology (44 citations). Tess Dawber has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara A. Morrongiello, Leon Kuczynski and Dawn M. Guthrie. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Infant Behavior and Development and Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact